When in 1848 Elizabeth Cady Stanton came to write the Declaration of Sentiments for the New York Women’s Rights Convention in Seneca Falls, she shaped it as a direct echo in form and substance of the Declaration of Independence…. There had been a blind spot in the Revolutionary vision. The promises of the Revolution had not been explored for what they might mean to women. The obvious way to make this point was to write a parallel declaration; to ask what the Declaration of Independence might have been like had women’s private and public demands been included.

—Kerber, Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980), xii (a leading scholar of women in the founding).

In colonial society…a married woman had had virtually no rights at all…. The Revolution did little to change [this].

—Richard N. Current et al., American History: A Survey, 7th ed. (New York: Knopf, 1987), 142 (a college textbook).

When Jefferson spoke [in the Declaration of Independence] of "the people," however, he meant only free white men.

—Lorna C. Mason et al., History of the United States, vol. 1: Beginnings to 1877 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1992), 188 (an eighth-grade textbook).

And today, two centuries later,…women in America are still struggling for the full freedom and equality denied them by the framers.

—Milton C. Cummings and David Wise, Democracy Under Pressure: An Introduction to the American Political System, 7th ed. (Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace, 1993), 45 (a college political science text).

The Declaration…refers to "men" or "him," not to women.

—James MacGregor Burns et al., Government by the People, 15th ed. (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1993), 117 (a college political science textbook).

[Early American men] would not accept them as equals.

—John M. Blum et al., The National Experience: A History of the United States, 8th ed. (Ft. Worth: Harcourt, 1993), 266 (a high-school textbook).